Academic help online

Academic help online

Do you think that the decision in Williams v Roffey should be extended to cover cases involving part payment of debt?

‘The Decision in Williams v Roffey Bros. & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd. (1991), which suggests that performance of an existing (contractual) duty can constitute consideration where it results in “practical benefit” to the promisor, sits uncomfortably with the principle in Foakes v Beer (1884) and creates further ambiguity in the scope of consideration in English contract law.’ Discuss.

Academic help online

All Rights Reserved, usbestwriters.com
Disclaimer: You will use the product (paper) for legal purposes only and you are not authorized to plagiarize. In addition, neither our website nor any of its affiliates and/or partners shall be liable for any unethical, inappropriate, illegal, or otherwise wrongful use of the Products and/or other written material received from the Website. This includes plagiarism, lawsuits, poor grading, expulsion, academic probation, loss of scholarships / awards / grants/ prizes / titles / positions, failure, suspension, or any other disciplinary or legal actions. Purchasers of Products from the Website are solely responsible for any and all disciplinary actions arising from the improper, unethical, and/or illegal use of such Products.